<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>danzrobok.com &#187; Service Oriented Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.danzrobok.com/category/soa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com</link>
	<description>Business Integration and SOA with an IBM WebSphere slant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:32:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is SOA Dead? &#8211; Webinar hosted by the WebSphere User Group</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/12/01/is-soa-dead-webinar-hosted-by-the-websphere-user-group/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/12/01/is-soa-dead-webinar-hosted-by-the-websphere-user-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Oriented Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Is SOA Dead?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere User Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I sure hope not but the Global WebSphere Community is holding a one hour chat on the subject:
 begin a

Session dates:  	   	Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Starting time: 	  	3:00 pm, GMT -05:00, Eastern Standard Time (New York)
Many organizations have started down the path of SOA, only to find that reality [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/12/01/is-soa-dead-webinar-hosted-by-the-websphere-user-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DataPower Architectural Design Patterns: Integrating and Securing Services Across Domains</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/08/26/datapower-architectural-design-patterns-integrating-and-securing-services-across-domains/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/08/26/datapower-architectural-design-patterns-integrating-and-securing-services-across-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>syndication</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DataPower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design pattern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/08/26/datapower-architectural-design-patterns-integrating-and-securing-services-across-domains/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <strong>Draft Redbook, last updated: Tue, 26 Aug 2008</strong><p>
- Introduction to DataPower Services<br />
- Integration Services<br />
- Security Services<p>
IBM® WebSphere® DataPower® SOA Appliances are purpose-built network devices that offer a wide variety of functionality such as the securing and management of SOA Applications, Enterprise Service Bus Integration, and high speed XSL execution.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/08/26/datapower-architectural-design-patterns-integrating-and-securing-services-across-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BPEL: Beware the use of nested loops in a short running process</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/07/03/bpel-beware-the-use-of-nested-loops-in-a-short-running-process/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/07/03/bpel-beware-the-use-of-nested-loops-in-a-short-running-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Integration Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Business Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Integration Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Process Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/07/03/bpel-beware-the-use-of-nested-loops-in-a-short-running-process/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the restrictions when dealing with a short running process is that it must always run within a single transaction. The implication is that the process must complete within the default transaction timeout window. On an application server, this is 120s.
We had an issue where our Process Server was creating a large number of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/07/03/bpel-beware-the-use-of-nested-loops-in-a-short-running-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WebSphere Business Integration V6.1 Performance Tuning</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/06/09/websphere-business-integration-v61-performance-tuning/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/06/09/websphere-business-integration-v61-performance-tuning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>syndication</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeveloperWorks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Enterprise Service Bus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Integration Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Process Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Business Integration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/06/09/websphere-business-integration-v61-performance-tuning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <strong>Draft Redpaper, last updated: Mon, 9 Jun 2008</strong><p>
- Learn valuable tips for tuning<br />
- Get the latest best practices<br />
- Try the example settings<p>
This IBM®  Redpaper was produced by the IBM WebSphere®  Process Server, WebSphere Enterprise Service Bus, WebSphere Adapters, and WebSphere Business Monitor performance teams in Austin Texas, Böblingen Germany, and Hursley England.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/06/09/websphere-business-integration-v61-performance-tuning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESB-CON VI: Lessons Learned on SOA Adoption</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/05/01/esb-con-vi-lessons-learned-on-soa-adoption/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/05/01/esb-con-vi-lessons-learned-on-soa-adoption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Oriented Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESB-CON VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integration Competency Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lessons Learned]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/05/01/esb-con-vi-lessons-learned-on-soa-adoption/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the opening panel, the John Fitzgerald Director of Product Marketing from Software AG mentioned a client&#8217;s SOA Lessons Learned. The three points are:

Strong Business Sponsorship
Start Slow with a Low-Risk Project
Integration Competency Center

I agree with all three of these points and I&#8217;ll provide my thoughts below.
Strong Business Sponsorship
You aren&#8217;t going to be able to get [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/05/01/esb-con-vi-lessons-learned-on-soa-adoption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSDL Anti-Pattern: xsd:Any and xsd:AnyType To Encapsulate Future Changes</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/24/wsdl-anti-pattern-xsdany-and-xsdanytype-to-encapsulate-future-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/24/wsdl-anti-pattern-xsdany-and-xsdanytype-to-encapsulate-future-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Of DZ.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Integration Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Process Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-pattern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service as a String]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSDL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xsd:any]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xsd:anyType]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/24/wsdl-anti-pattern-xsdany-and-xsdanytype-to-encapsulate-future-changes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cousin to yesterday&#8217;s WSDL Anti-Pattern: The &#8216;Single XML String&#8217; Service is the use of the XSD specification&#8217;s &#8216;any&#8217;.
&#8216;Any&#8217; literally means &#8220;any well-formed XML contained in this section is valid&#8221;. &#8216;anyType&#8217; means &#8220;any valid XSD Type&#8221;.  We can start to see the correlation between the Single XML String service and the use of these [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/24/wsdl-anti-pattern-xsdany-and-xsdanytype-to-encapsulate-future-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSDL Anti-Pattern: The &#8216;Single XML String&#8217; Service</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/23/wsdl-anti-pattern-the-single-xml-string-service/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/23/wsdl-anti-pattern-the-single-xml-string-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Of DZ.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Integration Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Service Registry and Repository]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-pattern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service as a String]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSDL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/23/wsdl-anti-pattern-the-single-xml-string-service/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WSDL is a very useful technology. It allows service providers and consumers to agree on namespaces, operation names, the data to be transmitted in a request and the data to expect in a response. All very good things to know, all in a platform neutral way.
Now, WSDL tells us what all the elements and attributes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/23/wsdl-anti-pattern-the-single-xml-string-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tip: Agree To Concrete WSDL Definitions before Development Begins</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/16/tip-agree-to-concrete-wsdl-definitions-before-development-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/16/tip-agree-to-concrete-wsdl-definitions-before-development-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Of DZ.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Integration Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antipattern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Oriented Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSDL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/16/tip-agree-to-concrete-wsdl-definitions-before-development-begins/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are a provider or a consumer about to enter development on a web service, you should have an understanding with your counterpart of the WSDL that defines the service. It should be very well &#8216;baked&#8217; and changes once development begins should be minimial.
Major things like name spaces and object names should rarely change [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/16/tip-agree-to-concrete-wsdl-definitions-before-development-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact 2008: SOA Jam &#8211; &#8220;Foster an External Community for Practitioners&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/11/impact-2008-soa-jam-foster-an-external-community-for-practitioners/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/11/impact-2008-soa-jam-foster-an-external-community-for-practitioners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Impact 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Oriented Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA Jam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/11/impact-2008-soa-jam-foster-an-external-community-for-practitioners/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m going to use this post to record the discussion that generated during the Impact 2008 SOA Jam for my idea about “How IBM can foster an external community”. Now that Impact is over, I’d like to keep a copy of it’s point in time, and also allow any future readers to add comments.
Foster an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/11/impact-2008-soa-jam-foster-an-external-community-for-practitioners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact 2008: SOA Jam &#8211; &#8220;ESB: Too Many Products, Skill Spread too thin&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/11/impact-2008-soa-jam-esb-too-many-products-skill-spread-too-thin/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/11/impact-2008-soa-jam-esb-too-many-products-skill-spread-too-thin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Impact 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Oriented Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Process Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA Jam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Too Many ESB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/11/impact-2008-soa-jam-esb-too-many-products-skill-spread-too-thin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m going to use this post to record the discussion that generated during the Impact 2008 SOA Jam for my idea about &#8220;Too ManyESBs, Skill Spread too thin&#8221;. Now that Impact is over, I&#8217;d like to keep a copy of it&#8217;s point in time, and also allow any future readers to add comments.
ESB: Too many [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/11/impact-2008-soa-jam-esb-too-many-products-skill-spread-too-thin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact 2008: Impressions of Day 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/09/impact-2008-impressions-of-day-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/09/impact-2008-impressions-of-day-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Zero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Process Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B-52s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSP-2518]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere sMash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/09/impact-2008-impressions-of-day-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Day two is in the bag, the B52&#8217;s are B-50-done. Perficient and MTS Allstream gave a session about SOA Patterns that I thought was today but was actually yesterday. Oops. Here&#8217;s the abstract if you have a time machine:
TSP-2518 &#8211; Effectively selecting integration patterns
Brent Legris, Perficient, Inc., Senior Technical Architect, Olivera Zatezalo, MTS Allstream Inc., [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/09/impact-2008-impressions-of-day-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The VETO SOA Pattern</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/01/the-veto-soa-pattern/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/01/the-veto-soa-pattern/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Integration Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Process Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Service Bus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA Pattern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VETO Pattern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/01/the-veto-soa-pattern/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve never been much of a patterns guy. I kind of always have the ability to apply common sense to a system and turn up something that is straight forward and makes sense. Periodically I get asked about what set of patterns I used to decide how a system should behave. To answer this question [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/01/the-veto-soa-pattern/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response to &#8216;Does Commercial Enterprise Software Suck&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/01/response-to-does-commercial-enterprise-software-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/01/response-to-does-commercial-enterprise-software-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Oriented Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Integration Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Process Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Does Enterprise Software Suck?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Application Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/01/response-to-does-commercial-enterprise-software-suck/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to point out to my readers that Johannes Brodwall has provided a &#8216;response to my response&#8216; on the topic of his post about the state of WebSphere. This blog doesn&#8217;t get too many comments, so I felt the need to point it out as he provides his opinions on WebSphere vs an OSS [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/04/01/response-to-does-commercial-enterprise-software-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle SOA Suite 11g &#8211; Hello Competition!</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/26/oracle-soa-suite-11g-hello-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/26/oracle-soa-suite-11g-hello-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Business Integration Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Oriented Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Integration Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Process Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle SOA Suite 11g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/26/oracle-soa-suite-11g-hello-competition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I&#8217;m sure you can tell, I&#8217;m very WebSphere focused. I have a hard enough time keeping up with the zillion WebSphere branded products that get released throughout the year. On my random surfing of the internet (tyvm Technorati) , I turned up Oracle&#8217;s entry into the world of SOA: Oracle SOA Suite 11g.
The interesting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/26/oracle-soa-suite-11g-hello-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Commerical Enterprise Software Suck?</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/25/does-enterprise-commerical-software-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/25/does-enterprise-commerical-software-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Of DZ.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Oriented Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Integration Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Process Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Does Enterprise Software Suck?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Application Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/25/does-enterprise-commerical-software-suck/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Johannes Brodwall&#8217;s Blog, he asks &#8220;Why does so much enterprise commercial software suck?&#8221;. In it, he mentions that his project migrated off of WebSphere and onto Jetty and regrets that his project didn&#8217;t migrate soon. The money quote:
But WebSphere is just the most blatant example of software that gives you nothing, gets in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/25/does-enterprise-commerical-software-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WebSphere DataPower vs WebSphere Enterprise Service Bus</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/18/websphere-datapower-vs-websphere-enterprise-service-bus/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/18/websphere-datapower-vs-websphere-enterprise-service-bus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Of DZ.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataPower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Oriented Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Enterprise Service Bus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apparent Manifesto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere DataPower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/18/websphere-datapower-vs-websphere-enterprise-service-bus/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, I blathered on about how great DataPower would be for usage in WebSphere Process Server. Your developer would be able to stay completely inside the Generic Business Object (GBO) data view while leveraging DataPower&#8217;s awesome ability to transform efficiently. Very neat indeed.
An interesting is scenario where DataPower IS the ESB. No WebSphere Process Server, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/18/websphere-datapower-vs-websphere-enterprise-service-bus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Business Integration Software Bakeoff Idea</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/14/business-integration-software-bakeoff-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/14/business-integration-software-bakeoff-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Oriented Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Great Business Integration Bake off]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/14/business-integration-software-bakeoff-idea/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my random browsing of the internet, I came across Wikipedia&#8217;s comparison of Business Integration Software. I&#8217;m so WebSphere focused that I didn&#8217;t even know there were this many companies out there with &#8220;ESB&#8221; products (34). It sparked an idea in my head, I wonder what it would be like to bake-off all these solutions [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/03/14/business-integration-software-bakeoff-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JDBC Adapter Export with events that comprise multiple rows</title>
		<link>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/02/28/jdbc-adapter-export-with-events-that-comprise-multiple-rows/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/02/28/jdbc-adapter-export-with-events-that-comprise-multiple-rows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Process Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design pattern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ingenious idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Adapter for JDBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/02/28/jdbc-adapter-export-with-events-that-comprise-multiple-rows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At my client, we had a unique situation occur when integrating a database and an export for the WebSphere Adapter for JDBC. In a &#8216;typical&#8217; scenario, a single row is written into a staging table, an SQL trigger writes this single row into the adapter&#8217;s event table, the adapter polls, converts the data into a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.danzrobok.com/2008/02/28/jdbc-adapter-export-with-events-that-comprise-multiple-rows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
